Some Blacks are not "black enough" to be advanced by the NAACP

Do you think that Rush Limbaugh's "NAALCP" designation for the NAACP is a "smear"?

 NAACP leaders caught on tape saying that one black man who was assaulted at a political event is not black enough to deserve protection by the NAACP:

Here it is, the day after a young brother, a young man, I didn’t mean to call him a brother, but on the front page of the Post Dispatch, ironically, he’s sitting in a wheelchair, being kissed on the forehead, by a European. Now just imagine that as a poster child picture, not working for our people.

Darleen at Protein Wisdom:

The Personal is Political mantra of the Left is no more glaring than in the realm of sex and race — what makes an “authentic” woman or “authentic” black person is determined strictly by their politics. The tactic allows the Left to keep its pet “minorities” in line with the threat of challenging their identity if they stray and it allows the Left to entirely avoid any substantive debate with non-left “minorities” because such “Uncle Toms”, et al, are just traitors to their sex/race.

The poison runs deep: J. Christian Adams, the DOJ lawyer who resigned over Black Panther voter intimidation scandal has written about the hostility of Obama’s DOJ towards “non-minority” victims. . . .

As Wretchard noted soon after this story broke,

The Black Panthers and the three men who are suspected of killing Robert Wone are not impotent underdogs. On the contrary, they wield far more power than we, in our normal lives, could ever dispose of. God grant we never meet them, for if we do, we meet them alone. . . . .

The conflict between the idea of laws built upon individual rights vs. the idea of laws built upon group rights and group equity is one of the primary ideological conflicts in our country at this time.